Ex parte Hendrikse: In re Louw

JurisdictionSouth Africa
CourtCape Provincial Division
JudgeKing R
Judgment Date29 September 1988
Citation1990 (3) SA 227 (C)

King R:

Dit is 'n aansoek om die aanstelling van 'n kurator ad litem om 'n bejaarde dame by te staan in 'n aansoek om haar onbevoegd om haar eie sake te hanteer, te verklaar en vir die aanstelling van 'n kurator bonis van haar boedel.

Mnr Andries Schreuder, prokureur van Springbok, word as kurator ad G litem voorgestel. Die 'pasiënt' is 81 jaar oud en is woonagtig te Garies.

Eenvormige Hofreël 57(5) bepaal dat 'n kurator ad litem 'waar doenlik 'n advokaat of anders 'n prokureur moet wees'. Die vraag wat dus ontstaan is of dit in hierdie betrokke geval doenlik sal wees om 'n advokaat aan te stel al dan nie.

H Dit blyk uit die stukke dat mnr Schreuder gereeld Garies besoek aangesien hy ander professionele verpligtinge daar het en dat dit dus nie vir hom nodig sal wees om 'n afsonderlike rit te onderneem om sy pligte as kurator ad litem uit te voer nie.

Dit word aan die hand gedoen dat die aanstelling van mnr Schreuder sal beteken dat die ondersoekproses en terugrapportering baie vinniger I afgehandel sal word en dat vervoeronkostes bespaar sal word (Garies is 'n aansienlike afstand vanaf Kaapstad geleë). Dit word aangevoer dat mnr...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • Boots Co (Pty) Ltd v Somerset West Municipality
    • South Africa
    • 21 September 1988
    ...me that Julies was also at fault. Regarding Julies, I cannot fault the way in which he drove. His J indicator was flashing for a 1990 (3) SA p227 Comrie A considerable distance. He saw the Jetta in his rearview mirror quite far back. He looked again in his rearview mirror immediately before......
  • Minister van Wet en Orde v Jacobs
    • South Africa
    • 15 January 1998
    ...(1) SA 342 (W): toegepas maar dictum op 346F—H gekritiseer/applied but dictum at 346F—H criticised Ex parte Hendrickse: In re Louw 1990 (3) SA 227 (C): dictum op/at 229B toegepas/applied Osman v Jhavary and Others 1938 NPD 443: na verwys/referred to E Rondalia Versekeringskorporasie van Sui......
2 cases
  • Boots Co (Pty) Ltd v Somerset West Municipality
    • South Africa
    • 21 September 1988
    ...me that Julies was also at fault. Regarding Julies, I cannot fault the way in which he drove. His J indicator was flashing for a 1990 (3) SA p227 Comrie A considerable distance. He saw the Jetta in his rearview mirror quite far back. He looked again in his rearview mirror immediately before......
  • Minister van Wet en Orde v Jacobs
    • South Africa
    • 15 January 1998
    ...(1) SA 342 (W): toegepas maar dictum op 346F—H gekritiseer/applied but dictum at 346F—H criticised Ex parte Hendrickse: In re Louw 1990 (3) SA 227 (C): dictum op/at 229B toegepas/applied Osman v Jhavary and Others 1938 NPD 443: na verwys/referred to E Rondalia Versekeringskorporasie van Sui......