Du Plessis v Minister of Justice

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeDe Villiers J
Judgment Date15 June 1950
Citation1950 (3) SA 579 (W)
CourtWitwatersrand Local Division

De Villiers, J.:

In Julie 1948 het die applikant 'n pamflet uitgegee onder die opskrif 'Malanazi Menace' en het dit verkoop teen 3d. stuk. G Die pamflet is in Engels geskryf en is nie spesifiek aan enige klas, ras of groep gerig nie.

Op 31 Maart 1950, deur Goewermentskennisgewing in die Staatskoerant is die uitgee en die verspreiding van die pamflet verbode onder die bepalings van art. 1 (7) van die Wet op Oproerige Byeenkomste, 27 van 1914, soos gewysig deur art. 1 (7) van Wet 19 van 1930, op grond dat in H die oordeel van die Goewerneur-generaal die inhoud van die pamflet bereken is om die gevoelens van vyandskap te verwek tussen die Blanke inwoners van die Unie aan die een kant, en die nie-Blanke deel van die inwoners van die Unie aan die ander kant.

Die applikant doen nou applikasie vir die opheffing van die verbod onder die bepalings van art. 1 (9) van die Wet, soos gewysig. Hierdie sub-artikel magtig die Hof om die verbod op te hef as die

De Villiers J

applikant daarin slaag om tot die bevrediging van die Hof te bewys dat die pamflet nie van die aard is dat die natuurlike en waarskynlike gevolg daarvan sal wees verwekking van gevoelens van vyandskap soos in sub-art. 7 omskryf.

A Die pamflet bevat 'n aanval op die Regering en die Nasionale Party en dié se beleid. Die politiek en die wetgewende program van die Regering word skerp gekritiseer, en word bestempel as ondemokraties, fasisties en waar dit die Kleur vraagstuk aangaan ten opsigte van die Naturelle, Indiërs en Kleurlinge word dit beskryf as onderdrukkend en stremmend. B Die skrywer verwys na die beleid van Blanke heerskappy as deel van die beleid van die Regering en sy party, en doen 'n beroep op alle liberaal en demokraties gesinde burgers om saam te werk, hulle geledere te sluit, en 'n gemeenskaplike front aan te bied in die stryd om die huidige Regering uit die kussings te lig, om sodoende die vryheid en C demokratiese regte van die landsburgers te beveilig en te handhaaf.

Die pamflet verwys in sy aanhef na die houding en handelinge van die Hereenigde Nasionale Party in die verlede, en beweer dat die beleid van die party die vryheid van elkeen in Suid-Afrika bedreig, of hy Engels of Afrikaans of Zulu praat.

D Dan handel die pamflet oor die sogenaamde 'Apartheid' beleid, die stemreg, die Indiër vraagstuk en die moontlike oplossing daarvan deur grootskaalse deportasie.

So gaan die pamflet aan en beskuldig die Regering en sy party van 'n E bedoeling...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 practice notes
  • Staatspresident en Andere v United Democratic Front en 'n Ander
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...v William Heinemann Ltd and Others 1965 (4) SA 137 (A) op 160F - G; R v Brown 1929 CPD 221 op 223; Du Plessis v Minister of Justice 1950 (3) SA 579 (W) op 581 in fin ; G Fisheries Development Corporation v Jorgensen 1980 (4) SA 156 (W) op 158E; Rose-Innes Judicial Review of Administrative T......
  • Argus Printing and Publishing Co Ltd v Inkatha Freedom Party
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...271 at 281 and 293; Pienaar I and Another v Argus Printing and Publishing Co Ltd 1956 (4) SA 310 (W); Du Plessis v Minister of Justice 1950 (3) SA 579 (W) at 590A-F and 581H-582A; S v Nathie 1964 (3) SA 588 (A) at 595A-596E; R v Sutherland 1950 (4) SA 66 (T) at 71-4; R v Bunting 1929 EDL 32......
  • State President and Others v United Democratic Front and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SA 984 (A) at 996; Room Hire Co (Pty) Ltd v Jeppe Street Mansions (Pty) Ltd 1949 (3) 1155 (T) at 1163D; Du Plessis v Minister of Justice 1950 (3) SA 579 G (W) at 581; Van Rooy v Law Society (OFS) and Another 1953 (3) SA 580 (O) at 584F - 585E; R v Ngwevela 1954 (1) SA 123 (A) at 127; Van Re......
  • Staatspresident en Andere v Release Mandela Campaign en Andere
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...11 (N) op 13; R v Pretoria Timber Co (Pty) Ltd and Another 1950 (3) SA 163 (A) op 181 - 182F, 184G; Du Plessis v Minister of Justice 1950 (3) SA 579 (W) op 581 in fin ; R v Rousseau 1956 (1) SA 783 (K) op 758A; R v Kunene 1960 (1) SA 155 (N) op 157; Publications Control Board v William Hein......
  • Get Started for Free
10 cases
  • Staatspresident en Andere v United Democratic Front en 'n Ander
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...v William Heinemann Ltd and Others 1965 (4) SA 137 (A) op 160F - G; R v Brown 1929 CPD 221 op 223; Du Plessis v Minister of Justice 1950 (3) SA 579 (W) op 581 in fin ; G Fisheries Development Corporation v Jorgensen 1980 (4) SA 156 (W) op 158E; Rose-Innes Judicial Review of Administrative T......
  • Argus Printing and Publishing Co Ltd v Inkatha Freedom Party
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...271 at 281 and 293; Pienaar I and Another v Argus Printing and Publishing Co Ltd 1956 (4) SA 310 (W); Du Plessis v Minister of Justice 1950 (3) SA 579 (W) at 590A-F and 581H-582A; S v Nathie 1964 (3) SA 588 (A) at 595A-596E; R v Sutherland 1950 (4) SA 66 (T) at 71-4; R v Bunting 1929 EDL 32......
  • State President and Others v United Democratic Front and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SA 984 (A) at 996; Room Hire Co (Pty) Ltd v Jeppe Street Mansions (Pty) Ltd 1949 (3) 1155 (T) at 1163D; Du Plessis v Minister of Justice 1950 (3) SA 579 G (W) at 581; Van Rooy v Law Society (OFS) and Another 1953 (3) SA 580 (O) at 584F - 585E; R v Ngwevela 1954 (1) SA 123 (A) at 127; Van Re......
  • Staatspresident en Andere v Release Mandela Campaign en Andere
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...11 (N) op 13; R v Pretoria Timber Co (Pty) Ltd and Another 1950 (3) SA 163 (A) op 181 - 182F, 184G; Du Plessis v Minister of Justice 1950 (3) SA 579 (W) op 581 in fin ; R v Rousseau 1956 (1) SA 783 (K) op 758A; R v Kunene 1960 (1) SA 155 (N) op 157; Publications Control Board v William Hein......
  • Get Started for Free