Your World of Legal Intelligence
 South Africa | 1-800-335-6202

De Beers Industrial Diamond Division (Pty) Ltd v General Electric Company

Judgment South Africa Law Reports Cited authorities 2 Cited in 11 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionSouth Africa
Citation1988 (4) SA 886 (A)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 practice notes
  • Water Renovation (Pty) Ltd v Gold Fields of SA Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Kemiska Fabrieker 1960 (3) SA 726 (A) B at 738C-H; De Beers Industrial Diamond Division (Pty) Ltd v General Electric Company 1988 (4) SA 886 (A) at In regard to the onus of proof, it was argued on behalf of the patentee that the objector to the grant of an amendment is burdened with the onu......
  • McKelvey and Others v Deton Engineering (Pty) Ltd and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Tools Ltd (1931) 48 RPC 33 at 38 lines 44-48, 56 lines 41-46 De Beers Industrial Diamond Division (Pty) Ltd v General Electric Company 1988 ( 4) SA 886 (A) at 897D-F Hat:tersley v Hodgson (1906) 23 RPC 192 Hleka v Johannesburg Cir:y Council 1949 (I) SA 842 (A) at 852-3 Kreepy Krauly (Pty) L......
  • SHFL Entertainment Inc v TCS John Huxley (Pty) Ltd and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...reasons or that the reasons should not be full (cf De Beers Industrial Diamond Division (Pty) Ltd v General Electric Company 1988 (4) SA 886 (A) at 895G – J). . . . (U)nder ss (9) reasons are not a jurisdictional requirement and a failure to give sufficient reasons can at most be a factor w......
  • SHFL Entertainment Inc v TCS John Huxley (Pty) Ltd and Another
    • South Africa
    • North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
    • 23 October 2013
    ...reasons or that the reasons should not be full (cf De Beers Industrial Diamond Division (Pty) Ltd v General Electric Company 1988 (4) SA 886 (A) at 895G – J). . . . (U)nder ss (9) reasons are not a jurisdictional requirement and a failure to give sufficient reasons can at most be a factor w......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
  • Water Renovation (Pty) Ltd v Gold Fields of SA Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Kemiska Fabrieker 1960 (3) SA 726 (A) B at 738C-H; De Beers Industrial Diamond Division (Pty) Ltd v General Electric Company 1988 (4) SA 886 (A) at In regard to the onus of proof, it was argued on behalf of the patentee that the objector to the grant of an amendment is burdened with the onu......
  • McKelvey and Others v Deton Engineering (Pty) Ltd and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Tools Ltd (1931) 48 RPC 33 at 38 lines 44-48, 56 lines 41-46 De Beers Industrial Diamond Division (Pty) Ltd v General Electric Company 1988 ( 4) SA 886 (A) at 897D-F Hat:tersley v Hodgson (1906) 23 RPC 192 Hleka v Johannesburg Cir:y Council 1949 (I) SA 842 (A) at 852-3 Kreepy Krauly (Pty) L......
  • SHFL Entertainment Inc v TCS John Huxley (Pty) Ltd and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...reasons or that the reasons should not be full (cf De Beers Industrial Diamond Division (Pty) Ltd v General Electric Company 1988 (4) SA 886 (A) at 895G – J). . . . (U)nder ss (9) reasons are not a jurisdictional requirement and a failure to give sufficient reasons can at most be a factor w......
  • SHFL Entertainment Inc v TCS John Huxley (Pty) Ltd and Another
    • South Africa
    • North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
    • 23 October 2013
    ...reasons or that the reasons should not be full (cf De Beers Industrial Diamond Division (Pty) Ltd v General Electric Company 1988 (4) SA 886 (A) at 895G – J). . . . (U)nder ss (9) reasons are not a jurisdictional requirement and a failure to give sufficient reasons can at most be a factor w......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT